Daniel Goode

Composer & Performer

Category: Uncategorized

The Stone – NYC

The Stone – NYC

Daniel Goode and friends at The Stone, 5/15/08
Clarinet solos and ensemble perform pieces from his collection, One Page Pieces.

Ensemble: Cornelius Dufallo, violin; Kamala Sankaram, voice and accordion; Deborah Weisz, trombone
Claire Daly, videographer

Relaxing at the Piano (2:17)

Clarinet Baby (4:29)

Sob-Laugh (1:56)

Sound Sculpture

Sound Sculpture
Daniel Goode

Concerto for Wire Sculpture and Gamelan from Daniel Goode on Vimeo.

Concerto for Wire Sculpture and Gamelan (excerpt)
video by Jody Diamond

SOHO GAMELAN WALK SOLO

SOHO GAMELAN WALK SOLO – 11/18/01

Daniel Goode

For best effect turn up the bass response on your playback device.

SOHO GAMELAN WALK SOLO – 11/18/01 from Daniel Goode on Vimeo.

SOHO GAMELAN WALK, FLUXUS EVENT

SOHO GAMELAN WALK, FLUXUS EVENT – 12/02/01

Daniel Goode

For best effect turn up the bass response on your playback device.

SOHO GAMELAN WALK, FLUXUS EVENT – 12/02/01 from Daniel Goode on Vimeo.

SOHO GAMELAN WALK, MAKE MUSIC NEW YORK

SOHO GAMELAN WALK, MAKE MUSIC NEW YORK – 06/21/09

Daniel Goode

For best effect turn up the bass response on your playback device.

CRITICAL MASS

CRITICAL MASS
by Daniel Goode

CRITICAL MASS from Daniel Goode on Vimeo.

Part 1 – 00:00
Part 2 – 07:22
Part 3 – 11:35 clarinet solo
Part 4 – 13:06
Part 5 – 18:00
North River Music
April 30th, 2009
Renee Weiler Concert Hall
Greenwich House Music School
Kamala Sankaram – soprano
Jessica Sabat – mezzo soprano
John Schenkel – baritone
Daniel Goode – clarinet
Marijo Newman – piano
Choreographed and danced by
Jody Oberfelder, with
Elise Knudson, Rebekah Morin, and Jill Frere
====================================
CRITICAL MASS
text by Daniel Goode
A specter is haunting America, a spirit is haunting America, a spirit of secular joy, of peace and community, enough for all, a spirit for us to enjoy.
Non credo in deo, non credo.
Oo-hoo-hoo a-ha-ha oo-hoo-hoo a-ha hoo-hoo-hoo ha-ha-ha hoo-hoo-hoo ha-ha.
Non credo in deo, non credo, non credo.
Oo-hoo-hoo a-ha-ha oo-hoo-hoo a-ha hoo-hoo-hoo ha-ha-ha hoo-hoo-hoo ha-ha.
Non credo, non credo, non credo, non credo.
Hoo ha ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha Hoo ha. Non credo in deo, no, no, no!
“Credo in us.” Thank you, John Cage! Credo in us!
A specter is haunting America. “[A]merica.” Thank-a-you, Lenny Bernstein. A spirit is haunting America, a spirit of secular joy.
Joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, joy, j, j, j, j, j, j, j, j, j, j, j, j, oooo! a spirit of sexual joy, sec, sec, sec, sec, sec, se-cuh-la, se-cuh-la, se-cuh-la, se-cuh-la, oooo!
Non credo in deo, non credo. No, no, no!
A mass for us, a mass for all, for us, for peace and community, planet, our home. Non credo, non credo in deo, non credo, non credo in deo. O, O.
Let’s meditate. Open the gate! For all, for us. Thank you, Pauline.* Sing any note, open your throat! Ah… Ah… Ah… Say any thing, then make it sing! Open your throat! Sing any note. Ah……
We believe in We believe in We believe in We—oo-ahh-ee-oo-ahh. Non non non credo-do-do-do-do-do, non credo in deo—ahh-oo-ee-ahh-oo.
We believe in We believe in We believe in We.
The suffering’s real, but death you don’t feel, shed your fears, then your tears, we are here, so are you, dear.
They say they speak in tongues, then why do they support the guns? We’ll show them where we put our tongues: aye-ee, ee-oh, you-ee, oh-aye, oh-wah, oh wah, ya-you, wah-ee.
It’s guns that kill people, not people, not people, it’s guns that kill people plus people plus people, oo-ah-oo-ah-oo-ah-oo-ah-oo.
People plus people plus guns that kill people, it’s people plus people plus bombs that kill people. It’s guns, put them down!—oo-ah-oo-ah-oo-ah-oo-ah-oo. Thank you, Meredith Monk, oo-ah-oo-ah-oo-ah-oo-ah-oo.

Now it’s your turn to thank some one, come on! come on! come on! come on! Thank some one! Thank some one!—oo-ah-oo-ah-oo-ah-oo-ah-oo. Thank some one on any note…
The suffering’s real, but death you don’t feel, shed your fears, then your tears, we are here, so are you, dear.
Endlessness forever is all we can divine. If that’s divine, that’s fine.
We are alone with each other, there is no other. If that’s divine, that’s fine.
Love, then experience, then: make the world a better place to live. That’s where we live and thrive.
There is no proof that any one has ever gone to heaven or hell.
Faith, they say, is proof, but to them we say: oh poof, oh poof! Oh poof, oh poof, poof poof poof poof poof poof poof poof poof poof poof.
Air is divine. In and out, breath! Air is divine, is fine, is fine.
Let in the thought of what is sought. Hm, hm, hm, hm.
Bring on the dance, let in the trance-ce-ce-ce-ce. Bring on the dance, let in the trance-ce-ce-ce-ce.
Let in the trance, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce. ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce, ce.
* Pauline Oliveros who composed Sonic Meditations
© 2005 by Daniel Goode

WINTER/SONIC GARDEN SHOW

WINTER/SONIC GARDEN SHOW

Electronic music by Laurie Anderson, David Byrne, Marina Rosenfeld, and Ben Rubin. Sonic Garden, October 17th – November 30th, 2002, Winter Garden, New York City.

Opposite the former World Trade Center site, the rebuilt Winter Garden of the World Financial Center is one of the most beautiful corporate-generated, public spaces I’ve ever seen. Dappled, brightly brown, marble floors under foot, huge glass and steel-domed atrium above, palm trees next to me as I wander, open-mouthed, full of questions about the “Sonic Garden” ambient music show I was about to hear. My questions were answered graciously and slowly in thick, resonant Caribbean English by security guards and maintenance men and women, as if this palace built by rich white men had been given away to the cleaners and guarders, rather than entrusted to the usual administrators, interns, curators, historians, proteges and owners of places like this.  The complete absence of managers or official gate-keepers seemed strange, disconcerting, and unintentionally subversive, a chink in the armor of multibillion-dollar capitalism. This huge, marble, glass and steel hall with rows of giant palms and comfortable green steel benches seating two apiece was quiet, even intimate on a late Saturday afternoon and early evening of Thanksgiving weekend, the time I chose to take in the event.

“Sonic Garden” was a forty-minute electronic music concert enveloping the Winter Garden atrium several times daily from October 17th through November 30th, 2002. I was informed of the show by a small computer disk sent to me in the mail by one of the producers, Creative Time. As promotions go, it was useful, with audio samples from the show by the four composers and a menu of information options. The four pieces do not get titles other than “Winter Garden Sound Installation” and the composer’s name. Interestingly, I think this simple lack of individualizing titles shifts the attention to commemorating the new space. I got there for the last performance, 9 PM, to a very small, seemingly random group of people who looked very good in the space, draped on the grand steps leading down, on the benches, or walking leisurely by. A few seemed the kind who might have come for the new music.

Music in such spaces, no matter the style—and this was art music mostly—is deeply social music, like elevator music, movie sound tracks and marching-band music. Not to observe the interface of site, audience, time of day, the social and economic forces that brought us all here at this moment would be a sadly limited criticism. Narrow, textual analysis, piece by piece has its place, but this music was made for a site that had been nearly destroyed by the explosions that decimated the World Trade Center, symbolic hub of the world economic order. The miracle of a rich country is how quickly it can bring back something of this magnitude. The four pieces by four composers were not in any way pointedly or politically about the renaissance of the Winter Garden. Instead, they used the occasion to express the values of immersion in a provocative and pleasurable procession of sounds, for a very disparate collection of people, only some of whom were an intentional audience for this concert. Incidentally, talking didn’t disturb, but some louder, compulsive conversations had to be escaped in order to enjoy this concert of ten minute pieces by two well-known composers, Laurie Anderson and David Byrne, and by two unknown to me, Ben Rubin and Marina Rosenfeld.

Ben Rubin’s piece put the wild, “primitive” shouts of the traders in crude oil from the New York Mercantile Exchange nearby together with dreamy triadic synthesizer chords and a rather limp commentary. I was electrified by the raw male “chorus”—the shamanic voices of mercantilism itself. The absence of women on the floor of power was dramatic—and unremarked upon. These men’s voices emerged from a large rectangular pattern of recessed loud speakers beneath the gratings holding the roots of the palm trees. An inspired sound design, and a neatly done technical feat. But the piece misfired to my ears, losing the energy of the traders’ cries which determine the price of crude. The composer says in his program notes that his piece celebrates a “vital verbal culture” but he does not fully explore the strength of this idea. If he had stuck with his ethnography, we would have been thrilled, even if repelled, and certainly the wiser. Did the composer pull some punches in order to be a “good neighbor” to the Mercantile Exchange, prettying up the male bellowing on the trading floor? A composer exploring an unknown land, transmitting a vision, a tribute, could have had a wonderful role to play. David Byrne did make such a tribute in his apotheosis of the world of Jewish comics. I’ll tell about that later.

Marina Rosenfeld’s piece used the whole giant space as a resonant chamber for her delicate, isolated pools of electro-acoustic sounds—with plenty of space/time between each spray or burst. I felt instant satisfaction in the clear knowledge that the aesthetics of Cage and Varèse have born fruit in later generations. Of course, this kind of space would call forth these apostles of sound. My body relaxed in the pure pleasure of that moment.

David Byrne did something totally unexpected. Emerging like Rubin’s piece from the recessed speakers under the palm trees came brief one or two liner jokes by some classic stand-up comedians: Henny Youngman, Mort Sahl, and Alan King. You could wait for a joke to come to your bench, or go chasing it as it came from under another palm tree. Not every story was intelligible, but there were delightful moments. A final long soliloquy against bigotry from one of the comics was not a joke, and led almost without a break to:

Laurie Anderson’s mournful violin tones, a kind of slow wordless ballad. The immediate and powerful effect was to bring out the melancholy loneliness behind the punchy tough little nuggets from the previous comedians. It suggested the sadness of making jokes in the midst of the mortality of all things. I don’t know why this happened to me, though my companion agreed. Perhaps the Bach Cello Suites or any other of a number of lovely string pieces would have had the same effect on me coming after the comedians.

But as it went on, the initial effect dissipated and the piece became aimless and boring to me, so that I impatiently crossed the huge space and climbed the grand staircase to read the composer’s notes. There I learned that something complex was happening through processing. Tones beyond our hearing range were being produced, and I guess, a melody was made from these tones, shifted down into the range of human hearing.

Which brings us back to melody. The first minutes of Anderson’s piece were pretty, affecting, and the piece worked like a dream after David Byrne’s. I felt that I was in a three-dimensional film and the music was a better-than-usual sound track; the “film” showed people, couples, children, tourists ambling through the Winter Garden, ennobled by the floating atmosphere of sound and space around them. I was in the film and observing it, both. This wonderful moment couldn’t sustain, but I had a vision, really an epiphany that, for the worshippers of civil society and its contents, like myself, a spiritual and sensuous time shared with others in a wonderful public place is about the best we can hope for, as far as spiritual experiences go.

And that brings me back to the question of hosting. The miracle of reproduction technology made it possible not to be beholden to performing artists who need acclaim when in the flesh. Nor were there rich sponsors, obsequious administrators there, or the infrastructure of the power network behind it all—to be either avoided or cuddled-up to. We were all absolutely free agents whose only caretakers were those security guards and maintenance men and women with the rich Caribbean accents, in uniform, with hand-held communication devices, standing in for all those others who provided our evening’s entertainment.

But to undercut my praise-song to public art, there was no crossing of class lines into a free moment of conviviality among all of us there in the atrium space. Instead we drifted out in dribs and drabs onto a view of the WTC site at night, brightly lit and ugly, prefabs all around, and now, a rather routine, even hum drum location for the banality of evil. We just gave it a glance and went looking for a cab.

It had been a good evening in New York.

[first published in Musicworks #86 Summer 2003]

WHO DOES THE WORK?

WHO DOES THE WORK?                                        Daniel Goode

—on reading Other Orchestras, a collection by Philip Corner

Preface: some quotation from the Phil’s scorebook:

(or let the fantasy run wild and come up yourselves with the greatest variety of things possible to do with your instruments…)

—All The Musicians Might Play This

There could be two different ways for the musicians to move in relation to…

—All The Musicians Might Play This

Repeated with all the variations of it there may be:…

—All The Musicians Might Play This

EACH MEMBER OF THE ORCHESTRA IS TO PREPARE A UNIT OF MUSIC WHICH…

—A POSSIBLE SYMPHONY

Let each player (there may be any number) make a long list of sound-note-tone effects

—INSTRUMENTALIZE

A sequential order of phrase-events is to be prepared…

—Notes of Orchestral Reality

There could also be a counterpoint of moving lines and areas.

—Space Shaping

A structure to be made combining areas of limited possibilities

PITCH______________one note

______________2 notes close by (intervals may be specified…

______________various types of chord…

permitted zones may evolve

(with no specification) no limitations

may change

or interrupt

or overlap…

Comparable forms are applied to other parameters…

Rhythms, of course…

In some sections the parts can be coordinated…

The now will be to fill out the range of possibilities…

—SYSTEMATIC LIMITS

…many of the interesting things heard and noted…recorded by well-directed audio apparat…notated with the help of elected sound analyzers and musicians…These details transcribed for the appropriate instruments…the composer arranges how the pieces will go together in the concert hall. Or conductor…or the musicians collaboratively…

—a way of accepting a commission                                     [sic]

So, who does the work, and when, at what stage, to make all this music happen: the contractor, the composer, the conductor, the player(s), the intern, the copyist, the friend?

Decisions, decisions. Choices, choices. Thousands upon thousands. Just for one piece of music. Some may be made quite quickly: to use a key signature, or not, if so which? Some may be agonizingly slow: to write down the music at all? In which system of writing?

A composer’s dilemma: I asked Phil Corner if he would consider writing out in notation one of his verbal pieces for orchestra. He said that yes, he would if it were going to be performed. And no, not before, because it would take so much work. So work is the issue, just as I thought.

A delicate issue: Are there people in positions of influence who, knowing that the work is valuable, could prevail on a performance group to schedule a performance, maybe even commission the work? Then the composer of the verbal score will go to work preparing a score, or presiding over the rehearsal to present the score. But if the work (the verbal score) is simply circulated, who will be stimulated by its form and content to take the next step? Many will say with reason that the verbal score is a plan for a score, a recipe for making a performance score (and parts), but not the score itself. Some will say it’s a prose poem about an imaginary piece of music that could be made by someone. Some will say that stimulating the orchestra, conductor, the players to make the score either in written form, or as instructions delivered verbally, would enliven the music-making through group creativity. Others might say that’s a recipe for chaos. John Cage said that a composer is someone who tells other people what to do. But that sounds harsh. Put it conditionally: if you want such and such a musical result, then here are the instructions telling you how to get it. What’s at issue is the complex ordering of thousands of details where there are already conventions in place to move the task along: like individual parts which distribute the tasks such that not everyone has to take the time to understand the whole. Someone called the conductor, or director of the rehearsal has been given the task of overview.

One problem with the verbal score is that this distinction is not made. And one can perhaps see why: the overview, the idea of the whole work is what gives the players the understanding of their individual role, without which they are nothing more than assembly-line workers, time-servers, people whose intelligence and passions are not required for their performance. No wonder the music suffers, along with the players.

I wonder, though, if there is a difference in kind between verbal scores like La Monte Young’s Composition 1960 #10: draw a straight line and follow it, and a verbal score of one, two, many pages with many directions, orderings, sub-routines, qualifiers.

I somehow can’t quite imagine a theatrical script that fits the slot of the many-paged verbal score for music. Either you say to the actors: improvise on a theme such as X, or Y, or you actually write down the words to be spoken. The long verbal score in place of the so-called musical score is a peculiar object. It could be looked on as a flow chart, but this begs the question of what a musical flow chart is or could be.  Should it be a chart with arrows, and branchings, and prioritizings shown in font sizes and highlights? Would this be more of an inducement to players, music directors, music curators, conductors? What would be won?

What I think lies behind the frequent and very real outward  attractiveness of the verbal score is its commitment to freedom. And its implied statement of the value of alternate choices. That is: why should one musical moment come exactly four bars after the previous one, and why should it be exactly five and half bars in length? When it could be longer or shorter or come later, or louder, or tutti, or solo? Isn’t each equally valuable, doesn’t each contribute just as much no matter which is chosen? Well, here’s the argument. Maybe there are better and worse choices and maybe we players, curators, conductors don’t want to have to make the decision about better choices. Maybe we don’t know, or haven’t the inclination to decide. We want someone else to sift through and decide. That’s the composer, or someone else designated by someone (the composer, again!) to do it.

Thinking, deciding is work. Putting the results of the thinking and deciding into a form that communicates to those who carry out the decisions is work. A computer can print or send either words or music. Someone needs to decide which it will be.

But maybe there are players, contractors, conductors, interns, curators who would like the extra responsibility of realizing a verbal score for the very reason that their creativity would give them energy and enthusiasm for the task of music making. Should there be a web site for them? Those who want the extra work, who would like to be contacted? I’d use it as a composer, for sure. I’ve worked with people like that. I know their value. But would I put my name on the site? Well maybe, but then just maybe, I’d like to be paid for my work! I accept exchanges.

TOY SYMPHONY: Program Notes 2007

TOY SYMPHONY: Program Notes 2007

Toy Symphony is a meditation in sound and text about war and “wars,” perpetrated by political and religious forces here and elsewhere. It is also an exhortation asking people: which war is this? One strand of thought leads to the most unromantic word of all: capitalism, the self-declared victor of a long political and economic war. A succinct phrase in opposition came from Pope John Paul II, who is also a doctrinal enemy of the rights of women. But why toys? Toy musical instruments played by grown-up musicians calls attention to the vulnerability of people in the face of the powerful armed by military or economic force. The use of toys deflates those forces at least symbolically through a playful, but serious irony. And also liberates us a bit to unwind and come together. There is also a powerful musical reason to combine toys with sophisticated musical instruments: toys extend the range of “real” musical instruments into the expressive realm of noise, the unruly and the transgressive. The setting of Robert Frost’s famous poem, Fire and Ice, is a reflection on endings of all things, but in today’s world, a reminder that we do not really know the fate of the earth. [DG]

Text for TOY SYMPHONY
Daniel Goode/Robert Frost

Beware… Beware… Beware… Beware…
He said
Who said?
Pope said
Pope John Paul said, he said
Beware of savage, wild capitalism.

Let’s take a tip from-Whom?
From Pope… [etc.]
He said it, Karol Wojtyla, he said it… [etc.] that one
Who is against the rights of women

Beware… [etc.]

“In time of war” da-dum, da-dum
“This time of war”
Which war is this?
Iraq or terror?
Terror, Iraq?
The undeclared war?
Or, the endless war?

Terror is a human feeling
No war can win
The War on Drugs
The War on Sin
No war can win.
The war against the secular war against Christ-T-T-T-T-T-T
Terror is a human feeling
No war can win.

Some say (Frost says) the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice -ce-ce-ce-ce-ce-ce-ce-ce-ce

e-ce-ce

Why Make CDs?

October 13, 2006

Tower is closing—why make CDs? We fought the idea of Tower when it started because it took a supermarket approach to music. But then we found it useful, and it even carried some of our CDs. Now they’re bankrupt because of the internet and Amazon. How long before Tower closes? I asked the guy at check out. “Well, first they have to get the stock from the other stores.”… So, why not do everything from our computer? Social life—easy! Even sex. Certainly shopping. No need to mix on a street, in a store eye-balling almost all of recorded music and some of the people who buy it. Oh, I saw a famous poet and his lover scarfing up CDs at 15%, 20 or even 30% off, as I was, also. He was wearing a fabulous red coat. But I’m sure he can be found on the internet, too. So nothing is lost, is there? We can still make CDs. We can up-load them. We need never leave our house. Order in.